Back to Blog

Kotlin Multiplatform vs Flutter vs React Native: The 2025 Developer Guide

Looking to build cross-platform apps in 2025? This comprehensive comparison of Kotlin Multiplatform, Flutter, and React Native will help you choose the right framework for your project based on performance, development speed, and real-world data.

Posted by

Kotlin Multiplatform vs Flutter vs React Native 2025 comparison

TL;DR: Which framework should you choose in 2025?

Choose Kotlin Multiplatform if you need native performance, have existing Android expertise, and prioritize long-term maintainability over rapid prototyping.

Choose Flutter if you want the fastest development cycle, consistent UI across platforms, and don't mind learning Dart.

Choose React Native if you have JavaScript expertise, need the largest talent pool, and require extensive third-party library support.

The cross-platform development landscape in 2025

The mobile app development world has shifted dramatically. With over 150 billion mobile app downloads projected for 2025, choosing the right cross-platform framework isn't just a technical decision, it's a strategic business choice that impacts your development velocity, user experience, and hiring pipeline for years.

Three frameworks have emerged as the clear leaders:


  • React Native still dominates with 42% market share
  • Flutter maintains strong momentum with Google's backing
  • Kotlin Multiplatform has jumped from 12% to 23% adoption in just 18 months

But here's what the numbers don't tell you: each framework excels in different scenarios, and the "best" choice depends entirely on your specific needs, team composition, and project goals.

Framework overview: what you need to know

Kotlin Multiplatform: share logic, choose your UI strategy

What it is: An SDK that lets you share business logic across platforms, with the flexibility to either use native UI components OR share UI code with Compose Multiplatform. Think of it as the "smart compromise" with maximum flexibility.

Key Features:


  • Share 90-95% of business logic code
  • Optional UI sharing with Compose Multiplatform
  • Native UI performance and feel (when using native UI)
  • Seamless Java/Android ecosystem integration
  • Production-ready since late 2023

Two development approaches:

  1. KMP + Native UI: Share logic, platform-specific UI (maximum native feel)
  2. KMP + Compose Multiplatform: Share both logic AND UI (faster development)

Best for: Developers or teams with Android expertise, enterprise apps requiring native performance, and projects wanting flexibility between native feel and development speed.


Flutter: Google's UI-first approach

What it is: A complete cross-platform framework using Dart that renders its own widgets instead of platform-native components.


Key Features:


  • Single codebase for UI and logic
  • Fast development with hot reload
  • Consistent look across platforms
  • Strong performance with compiled native code

Best for: Rapid prototyping, startups, and projects requiring pixel-perfect UI consistency across platforms.


React Native: JavaScript meets native

What it is: Facebook's framework that bridges JavaScript and native platform components, offering the familiarity of web development with native app capabilities.


Key Features:


  • Leverages massive JavaScript talent pool
  • Rich ecosystem of libraries and tools
  • Code sharing with web applications
  • Hot reloading for fast iteration

Best for: Teams with web development experience, MVPs, and projects requiring extensive third-party integrations.

Performance comparison: what the 2025 data shows

Recent testing and analysis from multiple sources reveals meaningful performance differences between the frameworks:


Memory and binary size

Advantage: Kotlin Multiplatform

KMP consistently shows leaner binaries and lower memory footprint due to native compilation and shared business logic architecture, while React Native's new architecture improvements have reduced memory usage compared to previous versions.


Startup speed and UI performance

Advantage: Flutter (UI Speed) / KMP (Native Performance)

Flutter's Impeller renderer delivers improved frame rates and reduced jank, while Kotlin Multiplatform provides near-native performance with significant improvements in GC pause times. React Native's Bridgeless architecture has improved performance but still faces challenges under heavy UI stress.


Real-world performance trends

Based on available industry benchmarks and developer reports:


  • Cold start times: Flutter generally leads in UI rendering speed
  • Memory efficiency: KMP shows advantages in resource usage
  • Frame rates: All three frameworks can achieve 60fps, with Flutter and KMP showing more consistent performance
  • App size: KMP typically produces smaller binaries, Flutter apps tend to be larger due to the rendering engine

Note: Specific performance metrics vary significantly based on implementation complexity, device specifications, and optimization techniques used.

Code sharing and architecture

How much code can you actually share?

Kotlin Multiplatform: Up to 100% code sharing with flexibility


Option 1: Business logic only (Traditional KMP)

// Shared business logic
class AuthRepository {
    suspend fun login(email: String, password: String): User {
        return api.authenticate(email, password)
    }
}

// Platform-specific UI (Android)
@Composable
fun LoginScreen() {
    // Native Android UI with Jetpack Compose
}

// Platform-specific UI (iOS)  
// Swift/SwiftUI implementation

Code sharing: 90-95% (business logic only)


Option 2: Complete sharing with Compose Multiplatform

// Shared business logic AND UI
@Composable
fun LoginScreen() {
    var email by remember { mutableStateOf("") }
    var password by remember { mutableStateOf("") }
    
    Column {
        TextField(value = email, onValueChange = { email = it })
        TextField(value = password, onValueChange = { password = it })
        Button(onClick = { viewModel.login(email, password) }) {
            Text("Login")
        }
    }
}
// This runs on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web

Code sharing: 100% (complete application)


Flutter: 100% complete sharing

// Single codebase for everything
class LoginPage extends StatelessWidget {
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return Scaffold(
      // Same UI everywhere
    );
  }
}

Code sharing: 100% (complete application)


React Native: 70-85% with some native code

// Shared JavaScript logic and UI
const LoginScreen = () => {
  return (
    <View>
      {/* Platform-adaptive components */}
    </View>
  );
};

Code sharing: 70-85% (may require native modules)

Ecosystem and library support

Third-party libraries

Kotlin Multiplatform: Growing but focused


  • 2,500+ KMP-specific libraries
  • Access to entire Android/Java ecosystem
  • Jetpack libraries gaining KMP support

React Native: Most extensive


  • 350,000+ npm packages available
  • Mature testing frameworks
  • Rich debugging tools

Flutter: Rapidly expanding


  • 50,000+ packages on pub.dev
  • Google's first-party library support
  • Strong widget ecosystem

Platform integration

Kotlin Multiplatform: Deepest native integration


  • Direct access to platform APIs
  • No performance overhead for native features
  • Seamless existing app integration

React Native: Bridge-based integration


  • Mature but sometimes problematic bridge
  • New architecture improving integration
  • May require native modules for complex features

Flutter: Custom implementations required


  • Platform channels for native functionality
  • Some features require native code
  • Good but not perfect native feel

Real-world success stories

Kotlin Multiplatform champions

Netflix

Shares business logic across platforms while maintaining native UIs

McDonald's

80% code sharing in global mobile app

Cash App

Critical financial features with native performance

React Native leaders

Facebook/Meta

Instagram, WhatsApp business features

Microsoft

Skype mobile applications

Shopify

Mobile commerce platform

Flutter Success cases

Google Ads

Consistent experience across platforms

Alibaba

Xianyu app serves millions with Flutter

BMW

In-car entertainment systems

The decision framework: Which should you choose?

Choose one of these frameworks based on your project's unique needs:

Kotlin Multiplatform


  • ✅ You have existing Android/Kotlin expertise
  • ✅ You want flexibility between native UI and shared UI
  • ✅ Native performance is critical
  • ✅ You want to gradually migrate existing native apps
  • ✅ Long-term maintenance cost matters more than initial development speed
  • ✅ You need deep platform integration
  • ✅ You prefer type-safe, modern language features

Choose KMP + Native UI when:


  • Maximum performance and platform-native feel are critical
  • You have platform-specific design requirements
  • Your app uses complex native features extensively

Choose KMP + Compose Multiplatform when:


  • You want development speed similar to Flutter but with Kotlin
  • Your team prefers Kotlin over Dart
  • You need to support desktop/web in addition to mobile
  • Consistent UI across platforms is more important than platform-native feel

React Native


  • ✅ Your team has strong JavaScript/React experience
  • ✅ You need extensive third-party library support
  • ✅ Code sharing with web applications is valuable
  • ✅ You require the largest available talent pool
  • ✅ Community support and resources are important

Flutter


  • ✅ You need the fastest time-to-market for MVPs
  • ✅ Consistent UI across platforms is essential
  • ✅ Your team can invest in learning Dart
  • ✅ You're building a greenfield project
  • ✅ Rapid prototyping and iteration are priorities

2025 trends and future outlook

What's coming next

Kotlin Multiplatform evolution:


  • Kotlin-to-Swift export releasing in 2025
  • Compose Multiplatform for iOS reaching stability (huge game-changer)
  • Improved IDE tooling and debugging
  • Desktop and web targets maturing rapidly
  • Seamless integration with existing Android projects

React Native improvements:


  • New architecture (Fabric/Bridgeless) becoming default
  • Better TypeScript integration
  • Performance optimizations continuing

Flutter roadmap:


  • Enhanced web performance with WebAssembly
  • Better native interop capabilities
  • Expanded desktop platform support

The verdict for 2025

The cross-platform landscape has matured significantly, and Kotlin Multiplatform's addition of Compose Multiplatform has been a game-changer. There's no longer a single "best" choice, each framework excels in specific scenarios:

  • For maximum performance and flexibility: Kotlin Multiplatform offers the best of both worlds, you can choose native UI for maximum performance or Compose Multiplatform for faster development, all while staying in the Kotlin ecosystem.
  • For fastest development and UI consistency: Flutter continues to lead in rapid prototyping and consistent user experiences, but Compose Multiplatform is closing the gap rapidly.
  • For team expertise and ecosystem: React Native remains unbeatable if you have JavaScript skills and need extensive library support.

The key insight for 2025: Kotlin Multiplatform with Compose Multiplatform has essentially eliminated the traditional trade-off between development speed and native performance. You can now have fast development AND native performance, making it an increasingly attractive option for teams with Kotlin experience.

Getting started: your next steps

Ready to build with Kotlin Multiplatform?

If you've decided on Kotlin Multiplatform, don't waste weeks setting up authentication, payments, notifications, and CI/CD from scratch.

KMPShip provides a production-ready Kotlin Multiplatform starter that includes:

  • 🔐 Authentication (Google, Apple, Email/Password)
  • 💳 In-app purchases and subscriptions
  • 🔔 Push notifications
  • 🚀 CI/CD pipelines
  • 📱 Complete sample app
  • 📚 Comprehensive documentation
  • 🎨 Customizable themes and components
  • ⚡ Ready-to-deploy configurations

Stop building boilerplates. Start building your product.

Sources and references

Note: Some specific benchmark numbers represent aggregated data from multiple sources. Individual performance may vary based on implementation details, device specifications, and testing methodologies. Salary and cost estimates reflect industry averages and may vary significantly by location, company size, and developer experience level.

Want to dive deeper into any of these frameworks? Check out our other guides on building production-ready apps with Kotlin Multiplatform and getting started with KMPShip.

Kotlin Multiplatform vs Flutter vs React Native: The 2025 Developer Guide